July
1-4th, 2004
Royal
New Zealand Police College
Authors:
Gisela Bichler, Stefanie Balchak, and Jill Christie
Abstract:
Efforts to diagnose the nature and characteristics of high crime
areas lead many to explore the utility of Geographic Information Systems
(GIS) to study crime. However, despite the critical importance of using
accurate data when identifying geographic patterns and studying hotspots,
few have explored the data quality issues inherent to plotting crime
events in detail. While software manufacturers provide some information
about the address matching process, critical details are left out or
are buried in technical, and sometimes proprietary, jargon. This paper
explores these neglected details and demonstrates how the assumptions
built into popular GIS software introduce bias. This close inspection
of address matching is necessary as much information is lost during
the interdisciplinary exchange of analytic techniques. Implications
for crime analysis are discussed.